Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC (1984)
Chevron v. NRDC (1984) established the modern doctrine of judicial deference to administrative agencies, profoundly shaping U.S. environmental and regulatory law. The Supreme Court’s decision allowed agencies like EPA to interpret ambiguous statutes, provided their interpretation was reasonable. In June 2024, this doctrine was overruled, fundamentally changing federal regulatory review[1][3][5][6][8][11].
Key Events Timeline
- 1977: Congress amends the Clean Air Act, requiring nonattainment states to regulate "new or modified major stationary sources" of air pollution[1][3][5].
- 1981: EPA introduces the "bubble policy," allowing plantwide emissions trading for permit purposes[1][5].
- 1982: NRDC challenges the EPA rule; D.C. Circuit strikes down the bubble policy[1][3][5].
- Feb 29, 1984: Supreme Court hears oral arguments[1][3][7].
- June 25, 1984: Supreme Court upholds EPA’s interpretation, creating the Chevron doctrine[1][2][3][5][7].
- 1984-2024: Chevron cited in over 18,000 federal decisions, shaping environmental, health, and financial regulation[4][5][8][11].
- June 2024: Chevron overruled in Loper Bright v. Raimondo; courts no longer defer to agency interpretations just because a statute is ambiguous[4][6].
Federal Cases Citing Chevron, 1984-2024
Chevron was cited in over 18,000 federal cases from 1984-2024, peaking in the late 1990s and declining after 2015 as the Supreme Court narrowed its scope[4][5][8][11].
EPA Major Rule Challenges: Outcomes by Era
In the Chevron era, about 62% of major EPA rules challenged in federal court were upheld, compared to 48% before Chevron and 41% projected after its overruling[4][5][8][11].
Clean Air Act: U.S. Air Quality Progress (1980-2024)
Year | GDP (T$) | Population (M) | SO₂ Emissions (Mt) | NOₓ Emissions (Mt) | PM₂.₅ (μg/m³) | Ozone (ppb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1980 | 2.8 | 227 | 23.5 | 22.6 | 21.0 | 88 |
2000 | 10.3 | 282 | 11.2 | 16.2 | 14.5 | 72 |
2020 | 21.5 | 331 | 3.7 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 65 |
2024 (proj.) | 24.2 | 335 | 3.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 63 |
Result: U.S. GDP and population grew sharply, while major air pollutants fell 60–85% since 1980, showing the regulatory and technological impact of the Clean Air Act and EPA policy[4][5][8][11].
Chevron Two-Step Test
Step 1: Has Congress spoken directly to the issue?
If congressional intent is clear, both court and agency must follow it. If ambiguous, proceed to Step 2[1][2][3][5].
Step 2: Is the agency’s interpretation permissible?
If the statute is ambiguous, courts defer to the agency’s reasonable interpretation, unless it is arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute[1][2][3][5].
Implications for Environmental & Administrative Law
Area | Chevron Era (1984-2024) | Post-Chevron Era (2024- ) |
---|---|---|
Judicial Review | Courts defer to agency interpretations if reasonable and statute is ambiguous | Courts independently interpret statutes, no deference to agency on ambiguity |
Agency Power | Agencies had broad authority to interpret ambiguous statutes | Agency power is curtailed; courts have final say on statutory meaning |
Regulatory Uncertainty | Greater predictability for agencies, less for regulated parties | Potential for more litigation and variability as courts may reach different interpretations |
Environmental Policy | EPA could adapt statutes to new scientific or economic realities | Agencies may face more legal challenges; major policy shifts require explicit Congressional authorization |
Why Chevron Matters
Chevron deference shaped U.S. environmental policy for four decades, allowing agencies to fill statutory gaps and respond to evolving science. Its overruling in 2024 shifts interpretive power to the judiciary, likely increasing litigation, reducing regulatory flexibility, and requiring Congress to legislate with greater specificity. This change will impact climate, air, water, and health regulation for years to come[1][3][5][6][8].
Key citation: Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984); Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 601 U.S. ___ (2024).