Planetary Boundaries Financial Risk Dashboard
    Quantitative analysis and scenario modeling for capital markets under planetary boundary constraints.
Data: Stockholm Resilience Centre, UN, IMF, Earth System Science (2025)
  
  Data: Stockholm Resilience Centre, UN, IMF, Earth System Science (2025)
Boundaries Breached
      6 / 9
      
      Climate, biosphere, nitrogen, phosphorus, land, novel entities
    Red Zone Boundaries
      5
      
      Nonlinear systemic risk (2025)
    GDP Erosion Risk
      2.1% / yr
      
      Projected by 2040 if >4 boundaries breached
    Boundary-Linked Lawsuits
      +38%
      
      Increase since 2022 (climate, water, biosphere)
    Restoration ROI
      7-12%
      
      Typical IRR for wetland/forest recovery
    Nine Planetary Boundaries
      - Climate change
- Biosphere integrity
- Biogeochemical flows (N & P)
- Land-system change
- Freshwater use
- Ocean acidification
- Atmospheric aerosol loading
- Novel entities
- Stratospheric ozone depletion
Safe Operating Space (2025)
      - Red Zone: Climate, biosphere, nitrogen, phosphorus, novel entities
- Yellow Zone: Land-system, freshwater
- Green Zone: Ozone, ocean acidification, aerosols (regional risk)
Key Advances
      - Machine learning quantifies 58% of systemic risk from boundary interactions
- IMF: 2.1% annual GDP erosion risk by 2040 if >4 boundaries breached
- EU, TNFD, and CSRD integrating boundary metrics into disclosure and regulation
Systemic Risk and Cross-Boundary Dynamics
      - Boundary breaches trigger nonlinear feedbacks and cascading collapse
- Tipping elements: Amazon, Greenland/Antarctic ice, AMOC, coral reefs
- Portfolio diversification fails under correlated biophysical shocks
- Legal and regulatory risk escalate with boundary transgression
Financial Exposure
      - Direct: Asset impairment, regulatory fines, input scarcity
- Indirect: Supply chain volatility, insurance repricing, reputational blowback
- Hidden liabilities: Stranded assets, undisclosed risk accumulation
- Systemic contagion: Cross-asset and sovereign revaluation
Dashboards and Quantitative Labs
      - Overlay asset maps with real-time boundary status (e.g., nitrogen, water, forest loss)
- Scenario simulation: Multi-boundary stress events, Monte Carlo VaR
- Interactive labs: Synthetic portfolio construction, scenario exposure modeling
- Integrate public Earth system datasets (GLAD, MODIS, Sentinel, GLEAM)
- Link telemetry to KPIs: EBITDA adjustments, biophysical dependency ratios
- Machine learning: Boundary breach forecasting, tipping point detection
Portfolio Construction Under Constraint
      - Boundary-aligned screening: Exclude firms/sectors in breached zones
- Stress-test allocations for threshold dependency and systemic risk
- Integrate biophysical concentration limits, not just asset/region caps
- Transition from ESG scores to threshold-based KPIs (e.g., extinction rates, nutrient flows)
- Scenario-adjusted DCF and WACC, sustainability-adjusted EBITDA
- Shortened time horizons for boundary-intensive assets
Market Innovation for Safe Operating Space
      - Biodiversity-linked bonds, nutrient trading, water scarcity derivatives
- Nature-based performance loans, debt-for-nature swaps
- Regenerative ag funds, watershed ventures, bioeconomy capital
- Ecological sovereign wealth funds, green regulatory guarantees
- Ecosystem service-adjusted ROI, resilience-indexed income streams
- Institutional investors as agents of planetary stabilization